MasonM wrote:chaissac1 wrote:Balkans are "normally" latakia blends(English) that have the orientals pushed forward that give a spicier, slightly sweeter nod to the blend.
That's what I have always considered to be a Balkan blend, an English with a heavier dose of Orientals.
This is the common belief, but if we consider the quintessential "Balkan" to be Balkan Sobranie, this definition doesn't hold water. Balkan Sobranie was originally formulated with a healthy dose of Latakia, lots of ripe virginias, and enjoy Yenidje to provide some spice. Still, the virginias dominated. As the recipe changed over the years, the latakia content was reduced, but the virginias continued to be the dominant "non-latakia" aspect of the blend. Dunhill's London Mixture, on the other hand, could be thought of as one of the prototypical English blends, and it's one that contains more oriental than virginia leaf. So, I'd submit that we've had the conventional "definitions" upside down.
Though I've found references in the literature for "Balkan tobaccos," meaning tobacco from the Balkan regions, the term "Balkan blend" is a relatively recent invention that, to the best of my knowledge, did not exist prior to discussion groups on the internet. (I'd love to find an earlier reference, but nothing has surfaced.)
As far as I'm concerned, now, the two terms are, in practical terms, interchangeable, though I've stopped using "Balkan" as a descriptor in any new discussions; if there's no agreed upon definition, it's pretty much meaningless. And, in the cases where I've used the term in my own tobacco descriptions, it generally adheres to the connotation outlined in the first paragraphs.